Posts Tagged ‘private consultations’

Questions, Questions, Questions

Friday, November 28th, 2008

Y’all know how much I hate answering the same questions time and again. I’m still getting tons of requests for personal consultations. People, if I were to personally consult with y’all, when would I have time to make a living? See my children? Sleep? So, no, I’m not going to meet with you no matter how much trouble you’re in (I don’t do guilt) or how much money you say you’ll pay (or greed either.)

I’m getting a lot of requests from people for advisors they can trust. I don’t give referrals. I’d be nuts to, since my stamp of approval would mean you wouldn’t have to do your homework checking references, asking questions, and making sure the fit was right for you. 

Tracy asks:

I’m so glad for this opportunity ask you a question about an issue that’s keeping me up at night. I’m 36 years old, and have a $23,000.00 line of credit debt, at 8.5% interest. …what do you think about ‘cashing in’ an RSP to get rid of the debt? I am currently paying approximately $500.00 per month toward the debt, but it’s really wearing on me, having this over my head. Your thoughts?

Tracy, I can’t begin to count how many times a week I get this question. Now that the caca has hit the fan, everyone wants to pay off their debt. But not all sources of cash are appropriate for debt repayment. It’s never a good idea to cash in registered assets to pay off debt because when you take money out of an RSP you trigger taxes on that money. It doesn’t matter how much discomfort you’re experiencing, that’s good. It’s what will keep you focused on paying off your debt. If you want to get rid of it faster, get another job and double your monthly payment.

Shari wrote:

I just finished watching your show today …You advised them at the end of the show that if they put 200.00/month away for retirement (I’m assuming they were about 30 years old so I guess we’re talking 35 years) at (you usually use 5%) they would have 500,000 dollars.

I watch your show all the time and I love it. However I often take your advice at the end and pop the figures into ING’s savings tool for the allotted years and interest rate and it never comes out to your numbers. Your numbers are always so much higher; meaning the final numbers at retirement that you give are usually hundreds of thousands of dollars more than what I can come up with on the ING tool calculator.

What am I doing wrong??? I‘m careful to put in the interest rate you choose and the amounts per month and for how many months, but it never comes out near to what you get. I would love to know how you are calculating these numbers.

Shari, I get this question all the time. When I calculate a couple’s long-term savings, it is based on an average rate of return of 7% (it was 5%, but I took it up to represent 25-year market averages for a balanced portfolio) inside an RRSP, where it will grow on a tax-deferred basis. And YES, the return inside an RRSP is that much greater than outside an RSP where you have to pay tax on the income you earn. Compounding return is the true magic of investing. I also assume the tax refund received as a result of the contribution will be reinvested to boost the RRSP savings.

You would need to use a retirement calculator (not a savings calculator) to get close to my figures. And to all those people who want to know where to get better than 2.5% on their money, you’re using the most obvious option: The Savings Account. There’s a whole world of investment options out there from which you can choose. I’m about to start talking about some of the basics shortly, so stay tuned.

Pam asked:

If you have no other debt than your house - is it “safe” or “ok” if your percentage of income that goes to housing is higher than 35%? (Still with a healthy balance in life/savings/transportation etc.)

Absolutely, Pam. If you have no debt, then the 15% that’s applied to debt repayment on the Budget Pie could be reallocated anywhere you wish. The Pie is a guide. Ultimately the only unbreakable rules are that you can’t spend more money than you make and you must save some!

A lot.. and I mean a LOT… of people write to me desperate because they don’t have enough money. This makes me sad for two reasons. First, I’m not a magician so you have to have money for me to work with when it comes to giving you financial guidance. I can’t pull money out of the air for you. Second, I hate yelling at desperate people.

Greg wrote:

What options are there to non-custodial parents that in a lot of cases are living below the poverty line and incur debt trying to survive and provide for their children.

Greg, my only advice at this point is to find a way to Make More Money. No money, no options. Ultimately, if you don’t have the resources to get to the end of the month before you get to the end of the money, there’s nothing I can tell you that’s going to make things work for you.

Dagmar wrote:

What are your thoughts about the Smith Maneuver?

I’ve had this question a dozen or fifty times. And I’ve avoided it because it’s complicated. But I’m weighing in today with the short version answer: I think it is very dangerous for all but the most sophisticated investors. Most people don’t understand how it works, and the potential losses from leveraging are huge.

Three more things:

I’m moving Friday, December 5th so I won’t blog that day. Hope to be back Monday, but don’t panic since I have to have new services hooked up. They are supposed to be ready by then, but ya never know.

How would y’all like to weigh in on a couple of “case studies”… questions I believe you could help with by sharing your experience and knowledge. If you’d like to do this, I’ll let you all have your say, and then I’ll give a nod or nix what needs nixing so the body who asked the question is given sound advice. What say you?

For people who have ordered the TDDUP Life Planner, I’m told the books start shipping about Dec 8th or so. 

This and That

Friday, October 24th, 2008

First off, the Your Story, Getting to Debt Free pages are up and the first story has been posted. And while Emma was quick off the mark with her story, no one else has sent me one since. Get busy people. To get to the page, you can start on my home page or from my blog. The instructions for how to use the pages are in the top right corner under Telling Your Story.

I’ve been getting a lot of questions and comments recently about the need for me to do stuff for single people and parents without partners. I’m just curious as to why people think being single or a sole parent is any different than being partnered. Is it because there’s the perception that there’s loads more money available? What about all those traditional families where there’s only one income earner? No more money, just more mouths to feed.

The reality is that success with money has very little to do with how many people are bringing home the bacon. It’s more about how the money coming in is spent, saved and managed. Whether there’s one income-earner or two, having a budget, prioritizing and keeping track spending, and building a safety net applies. Yes, it can be harder when you are a sole parent and sole provider, but that’s life. Sometimes it sucks. But it isn’t any different from people who are partnered and having a crappy experience, and believe me, there are plenty of those. If you want to make your money work for you, you need a plan. You start with a budget and then you go from there. The budget is the foundation on which you build. Gail’s Budget Worksheet on the site that will let you plan what you do with your money, pour the amounts you should have into the jars and show you your percentages.

Speaking of the budget, people are also always writing me to find out how to apportion the money in their jars. They’ve seen the jars on TV, but haven’t taken the time to explore the website, so don’t know about the budget worksheet. Hey, I’ve provided the tools on the site, now those who need them must use them. So a little initiative, people, please.

Another question I get quite often is about what to do with money left in the jars at the end of the month. Some of those jars are meant to accumulate. Let’s face it, if you have $25 a month for clothes, then it may take a few months before you have enough to buy your kid’s new snowsuit. Ditto transportation, in which you accumulate your car repair money. Grocery money, too, should sit there for a while since there are big cost items (think laundry and cleaning supplies) that have to be replaced on a less frequent basis.  (BTW if you’re eating in restaurants, that’s coming out of the food/personal care jar.) If you have money left over in the entertainment jar, either you’ve budgeted too much, or you’re not having any fun. Fix that. And the Other jar… ah yes, the Other jar. People have no idea what goes into this jar.  It’s everything that’s variable that’s not in the first four jars so it may include kids’ allowances, pets, medical, and banking if you have money allocated in those categories. (I know, the banking money should stay in the bank, but it’s a variable cost and I had to put it somewhere! Just put it back in the bank.)

If after six months you have a lot of money left in the jars that you’re simply not going to spend, leave enough of a float in the jars to cover unusual expenses and by all means slap the rest against your debt (first choice) or into your savings. You should also revamp your budget numbers so that they reflect your lower-than-your-thought spending.

If you write me a question and I don’t respond, one reason may be that I’ve answered a similar question before. Check the Your Questions section. Also read the articles and the past blogs. Financial institutions have for years tried to convince me (as their resource) that their clients are pretty simple and must be spoon-fed, which is why so much of their material is basic and light. I’ve tried to convince them that their clients are smart and need more meat. All the people who won’t take the time to do some research on the site are proving me WRONG.

As for all the people who write to ask if I’ll do a private consultation, the answer is still no. It’s a time thing. You might be surprised at the number of people who ask this question. I get 15 or so requests a week. People are desperate for help. I know that y’all are. And I wish I could be everywhere, but I simply can’t. So that’s why I created the site. There are tools available and lots of advice. Now you just have to put your butts in gear.

There are people who want to do what I do and ask how I got into this. It was a very round about process, so I’m afraid I can’t help you there either. The best I can suggest is that you find an institution that you think shares your values, join up, and learn from them.

I’ve had one or two people object to my language, my attitude and my approach to working with people. If you don’t like me, that’s okay. Not everyone will. Just ignore me then. I don’t expect to be everyone’s cup of tea.

And finally, my response to this:

Oprah has had Suze Orman on a couple of times in the last month. She recommends having 6-8 months of living expenses saved up as an emergency fund. You tell people to put $100 a month. Is Suze being extreme?

I often get misquoted because some of the things I say are taken out of context. I, too, believe that you should have a healthy stash of cash available for emergencies. My rule of thumb is to have six months’ worth of Essential Expenses at the ready. I never tell people to put away $100 a month as a rule. However, that’s often where I start my fams off on the show, to get them in the rhythm of saving for emergencies.

People, money management requires that you do more than grab at a snippet here and there. You must make the commitment to learning about how money works and how to make it work for you. And while different “experts” have different amounts or percentages that they use as their rule of thumb, those are less important than the actual planning they are suggesting that you do. So if Suze says eight months and I say six, that’s way less important than the main message, which is “have an emergency fund.” And if Dave Ramsey says pay of your smallest debt first and I say pay off your most expensive debt first, that’s less important than the main message, which is “pay off your ficken debt!”

When you get caught up in the details, arguing one person’s strategy over another’s you’re participating in obfuscation. You’re focusing on the stupid little details so you can avoid the big message. The investment world has long used this device to keep people in the dark, presenting myriad messages that have only served to confuse Joe and Joanna Average about what to do. Don’t get caught up in this.

You have a brain. Use it. Listen to what the experts say, apply it to YOUR life, and make it work for YOU. We speak in generalities because we must. But you’re living your SPECIFIC life, and you should make a plan that works for YOU.

If there’s one thing that makes my fams successful, it’s that they have a plan that’s specific to their individual needs and that they can build on. When I leave, I give them their budgets and debt repayment plans, point them to my website and tell them to keep the thing alive by reviewing it at least a couple of times a year. We change. Our circumstances change. So should our money plans.

Bookmark:   del.icio.us Digg StumbleUpon